“Its importance within the Derridean canon cannot be overemphasized The text that scholars turn to to understand the politics of deconstruction.” – Southern. Jacques. Derrida. Specters of Marx. The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International. Translated from the French by Peggy Kamuf. With an. The culmination of this change in emphasis is in Spectres of Marx, published in , in which Derrida writes that political philosophy “structures implicitly all.

Author: Kijar Fem
Country: Gambia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 2 November 2004
Pages: 460
PDF File Size: 4.44 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.12 Mb
ISBN: 998-8-91205-410-4
Downloads: 16499
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gokazahn

Derrida’s investigations of the increasingly spectralized nature of the New World Order-and what a productive critique of it would look like-are therefore inestimably valuable and relevant in today’s world.

Heidegger who misjudged Freud who misjudged Marx. The review above rightly notes the superiority of this concept to “trace” or “difference” because it gives a mard kind of presence to what is only purportedly absent from the supposedly present-at-hand signifier.

The gift of its finitude? One must constantly remember that this absolute evil which is, is it not, absolute life, fully present life, the one that does not know death and does not want to hear about it can take place. Far from effacing differences and analytic determinations, this other logic calls for other concepts. Just drawing our attention to this pattern is a contribution to philosophy any student should be proud of. Politicians are thus seen now as ” structurally incompetent.

Needless to say, these currents and the groups formed around them were mutually exclusive. Books by Jacques Derrida.

The Time of Marx: Derrida’s Perestroika – Los Angeles Review of Books

By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Hyland – – Research in Phenomenology 42 1: It does not behave according to the materials with which we are otherwise familiar. Marx does indeed say: Nevertheless the defence is conducted with much rhetorical vigour and lofty humour. If you don’t understand his references, put the book down and find out what he’s on about.

Beyond these dimensions, which are not only those of an exegesis of Marx, at stake is doubtless everything which today links Religion and Technics in a singular configuration. But it is the inheritance of a double bind which, moreover, signals toward the double bind of any inheritance and thus of any responsible decision.


Specters of Marx

Of the injunction or oath that puts Capital in motion? But it is so while destabilising permanently, and in a more or less subterranean fashion, the order of conceptual distinctions that are put to work.

For a premise of this new reading is that specters come back as well from a future that is no more present, no less spectral than the past. The subsequent sections are a somewhat more mixed bag. Now, fear is not good for the serenity of research and the analytic distinction of concepts.

You may well imagine that I was not totally unaware of it. Thank you for signing up! How to relate, but also how to dissociate the two messianic spaces we are talking about here under the same name?

So yeah, I grabbed this book ’cause I needed some more theory on hauntology and I wanted to read the OG who came up with the term.

At least for us and for the moment.

One would have to say why it frightens or strikes the imagination, and what fear, imagination, their subject, the life of their subject, and so forth, are. He follows this description with a positive prescription for political action.

Derrida against Fukuyama seems like shooting fish in a barrel when the inadequacies of liberal economic models have been so widely and painfully demonstrated in the intervening period and were probably pretty obvious even at the height of Western triumphalism. Diffused throughout the world, difficult to recognize or even name, “the hegemony or the imperialism in question” is nonetheless securing its own power in every realm of human existence, public and private.

History of Western Philosophy. These questions and these hypotheses do not exclude each other.

Spectres of Derrida | Richard Kreitner

We are discovering what Marx has left for us. It marks off its territory by setting out there strategies and sentinels under the protection of apotropaic shields. Derrida feared his present, and he tried to dissipate it into the past and the future. This constitutes the rousing first half by far the most interesting of the book, clarifying deconstruction with the fortuitously graphic term “hauntology” ontologie and stating if not a personal political position at least an attitude.


What is the relationship between the event and political action? In order for there to be any sense in asking oneself about the terrible price to pay, in order to watch over the future, everything would have to be begun again. The commodity thus haunts the thing, its spectre is at work in use-value. The Haunting of Hill House Eps. This was not a critical question, but rather a deconstruction of the critical limits, the reassuring limits that guarantee the necessary and legitimate exercise of critical questioning.

The mystical character of the fetish, in the mark it leaves on the experience of the religious, is first of all a ghostly character.

Spectres de Marx. L’État de la dette, le travail du deuil et la nouvelle internationale

The German idiom seems to name the ghostly return but it names it in a verbal form. The specter is something that is not present, not real, not there, but that nonetheless enters into and disrupts the closure and self-presence of whatever is present, real, and there.

These questions posed, or rather suspended, we can perhaps return to what Capital seems to want to say about the fetish, in the same passage and following the same logic. Such a process demands of us a political and philosophical vigilance in order to resist repeating the mistakes of the past and to avoid losing an opportunity to criticize and question the increasingly international hegemony staking out its power everywhere.

Marx warns us with the first words. However, my reading influenced predominantly by Heidegger, Levinas and Nietzsche treats Derrida as a political philosopher, in this and not the only case investigating the hub beyond Marx’ arguably gothic attitude, which after a brilliant juxtaposing with Hamlet is revealed as something more than merely a set of metaphors. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, But before we get to that, let us take a few steps backward and formulate a few questions.